Eight months ago, the Los Angeles City Council voted to overhaul the way trash is picked up at tens of thousands of businesses and large residential buildings, giving the work exclusively to a select group of companies. Backers of the program, championed by Mayor Eric Garcetti, said the new system would increase recycling, roll out cleaner-fuel trash trucks and improve workplace safety for sanitation workers. But the new program, known as RecycLA, is not being universally welcomed by the businesses and residents who will rely on it for their trash pickup. In recent weeks, customers have begun complaining about soaring prices, uncollected trash and calls to their new waste hauling companies going unreturned. …
Source: James Nani, Times Herald-Record, June 25, 2017
Major changes to city sanitation services are unlikely to materialize this year after negotiations between city and union officials to privatize waste-hauling reached an impasse. The city and the CSEA union, that represents more than 100 city workers and about 14 city sanitation workers, had been negotiating a new contract since late 2014. … CSEA Southern Region President Billy Riccaldo has claimed that the costs of outsourced sanitation have “spiraled out of control in many communities after initial lowball bids” and that outsourcing means surrendering control on prices, scheduling and other factors that can affect price and inconvenience residents. Jessica Ladlee, a CSEA spokeswoman, said members do not want to trade negotiating people out of their union for salary increases.
Middletown explores outsourcing waste hauling
Source: James Nani, Record Online, May 2, 2017
Middletown officials are in negotiations with the union representing city sanitation workers as the city explores outsourcing waste hauling, a move that could eliminate the 14-member department. The talks with the union come as Middletown considers two options to reduce the cost of city sanitation services: either privatizing the services or downsizing and automating part of the department. … But under a push by Alderman Joe Masi, the city last released a request for proposals on the costs of private waste haulers to take over all waste services. As part of the request, any private hauler who wins a contract with the city would have to hire all city sanitation workers for one year. The move has met with resistance by the CSEA, which represents city sanitation workers. …
Source: WTVQ, May 8, 2017
A temporary shutdown of the LEXserv online and phone bill payment system has been scheduled as Lexington’s Division of Revenue takes over the service from Greater Cincinnati Water Works. Beginning May 15, the city will manage all LEXserv customer service and billing services, eliminating the need for outsourcing. Officials say some of the many benefits include:
- City will save taxpayer dollars by moving system in-house;
- Customer service will be handled by LFUCG staff in Lexington, creating jobs;
- Payments will be mailed to a Lexington address for processing;
- New web portal for customers to make payments, review billing. …
Source: Christian Hetrick, Press of Atlantic City, May 17, 2017
Angry workers and residents criticized the state’s move to privatize trash collection Wednesday night during a long public-comment portion of a City Council meeting. The meeting came two days after officials running a state takeover of the city bypassed the council to approve a three-year, $7.2 million contract to Gold Medal Environmental of New Jersey, a company in Gloucester County. … City officials say the deal will save the financially-troubled city $1.1 million this year and won’t require layoffs. Sanitation workers will fill vacant positions in the Public Works Department, city and state officials said. The council tabled a vote to outsource the service three weeks ago after some council members said they never received a cost-savings analysis. …
State privatizes Atlantic City trash collection without City Council
Source: Christian Hetrick, Press of Atlantic City, May 16, 2017
Officials running a state takeover of the city bypassed City Council on Monday to privatize the city’s trash collection. The state authorized the city administration to award a three-year, $7.2 million contract to Gold Medal Environmental, a private company that will handle the city’s trash and recycling collection. The decision came nearly three weeks after the council pulled a vote to outsource the service. State Local Government Services Director Timothy Cunningham informed Council President Marty Small of the decision in a letter dated Monday, a copy of which was obtained by The Press of Atlantic City. … The move marks the first time the state has used such power over the council. The state took over the city’s finances in November through the Municipal Stabilization & Recovery Act, which gave state officials authority to pass or repeal any council resolution. Cunningham’s letter specifically cited the state’s power to “procure services” on behalf of the city.
… City administration officials said the contract to Gold Medal will save the city $1.1 million per year without requiring layoffs. The council considered the contract to Gold Medal on April 26, but balked at outsourcing the service after some councilmen said they didn’t have enough information. Those council members, including Councilman Frank Gilliam, had said they never received an analysis comparing the contract to the cost of doing the service in-house. Gilliam said Monday that he had since received a report from city Public Works Director Paul Jerkins, but said the cost analysis didn’t have “legitimate numbers” that justify the savings claimed by the city and state. …
Atlantic City Council to consider privatizing trash collection
Source:Christian Hetrick, Press of Atlantic City, April 25, 2017
City Council will consider privatizing trash collection, awarding a contract for a bike loop and amending rules regarding rolling chairs Wednesday evening. The council is scheduled to vote on awarding Gold Environmental of New Jersey a three-year, $7.2 million contract to handle the city’s trash and recycling collection. The measure is intended to cut costs in the cash-strapped city. The city’s 2017 introduced budget listed a $393,313 savings from its Public Works Department this year. …
The U.S. Department of Justice announced April 24 that Energy & Process Corporation (E&P) of Tucker, Georgia, will pay $4.6 million after allegations of violating the False Claims Act. According to the department, E&P had a contract to construct a Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear waste treatment facility. The company is purported to have knowingly failed to perform required quality assurance procedures. Additionally, it allegedly supplied defective steel reinforcing bars. … “Our complaint alleges that after actively touting its experience with nuclear construction and quality assurance work, and then being hired to perform such work in connection with an important project, E&P chose to forego the agreed to quality assurance work, and then compounded this failure by falsely certifying to the government that it had performed the quality assurance work,” said U.S. attorney John A. Horn for the Northern District of Georgia. …
The city of Oakland, CA has filed a lawsuit against its recycling service provider, California Waste Solutions, in Alameda County Superior Court over a “draftsman’s error” that allows the company to charge significantly more than intended for moving recycling bins, as reported by SFGate.
Single-family homeowners are charged $27.85 to have their recycling bins pulled to the curb and that fee was supposed to be the same for residents in multi-unit buildings. Instead, the contract allows California Waste Solutions to charge up to $776.13 for this service at multi-unit buildings. That fee is meant for full-size dumpsters, not standard bins. While no one has reported the company charging this full amount yet, multiple customers have seen rate increases since the city’s current contract began in 2015. The city is suing to cap the rate at its intended amount and recuperate an unspecified amount of overcharges, with interest, that resulted from the higher rate. …
Waste Management Launches Referendum Drive to Win Back Oakland Garbage Contract
Source: Sam Levin, East Bay Express, September 4, 2014
…Now, Waste Management is taking another route to fight CWS’ award — collecting signatures from voters in the hopes of passing a referendum to overturn the council’s decision. Waste Management, a Texas-based corporation, has hired local political strategist Larry Tramutola to help lead the referendum effort, according to David Tucker, director of community and public relations for Waste Management. Tucker told me that the company began collecting signatures over the weekend and has to turn in petitions within thirty days of the city finalizing its decision to award the garbage contract to CWS. That means that by September 26, Waste Management has to collect roughly 21,000 eligible signatures, representing 10 percent of the city’s voters. If successful, the award of the contract to CWS would be put on hold until Oakland voters have an opportunity to directly weigh in on a referendum overturning the city’s ordinances authorizing CWS to take over the franchise. …
Waste Management sues Oakland over $1 billion trash contract
Source: Will Kane, San Francisco Chronicle, August 18, 2014
The nation’s biggest trash hauler sued the city of Oakland on Monday claiming that the City Council illegally steered a $1 billion contract to a local garbage company with which it has “personal and political connections.” The suit, filed in Alameda County Superior Court by Waste Management, claims that Oakland’s City Council at the last minute steered the 10-year contract to collect garbage, recycling and compost in Oakland to an ill-prepared local company over the objections of city staffers, who argued the big Texas firm was in the best position to win the deal. The council awarded the contract to California Waste Solutions, a West Oakland recycling company that, the suit said, had not held a garbage-hauling contract in the United States, submitted proposals that were late and did not comply with the city’s contracting rules. In addition, the city gave that company confidential information about Waste Management’s pricing and proposal, the suit said. The suit asks the court to overturn that decision and effectively award the contract to Waste Management….
In recent decades, the federal government has turned to private corporations to help handle everything from intelligence to prisons. Should nuclear waste be next? That’s a question currently being considered by the Department of Energy, as it looks for solutions to the long-standing problem of how to store radioactive waste from nuclear power plants. Now, with Rick Perry slated to head the department, the issue could become more complicated. That’s because the former Texas governor has deep ties to a waste disposal company that could create a significant conflict of interest once he becomes energy secretary. Nuclear waste is currently held at power plants across the country—some of which are no longer operating. The federal government was supposed to start consolidating the waste from these plants nearly 20 years ago, but it hasn’t been able to find a way to dispose of it.
… Because Yucca Mountain had been stalled for so long, the federal government began to explore the possibility of working with private companies for interim storage of the waste—a temporary solution that could last for decades. … One company eager to get in on interim storage is Texas-based Waste Control Specialists, which last year applied for a license with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and will be submitting a preliminary proposal to the Department of Energy before the end of the month to store high-level nuclear waste for the federal government. … Watchdogs worry the company’s ties to Perry could create a conflict of interest. … Reed, the Texas Sierra Club official, says his primary concern is that if something goes wrong and waste isn’t properly stored, the government could ultimately end up dealing with an expensive cleanup. “Private companies…can easily go belly-up depending on short-term economic realities,” Reed said. “With radioactive waste, you really want to make sure the person watching the waste is more permanent than companies are. The real concern is companies walk away from things, and then other people are left holding the bag.”
A proposal to privatize garbage collection in Scarborough is on the agenda today as the public works and infrastructure committee meets at city hall. Staff are recommending that the city hold a managed competition procurement process for District 4, which includes all of Scarborough, while leaving garbage collection in District 3 to unionized city workers for now. The managed competition procurement process would allow both private companies and the city’s unionized workers to submit bids. … While staff are only recommending privatizing garbage collection in Scarborough right now, the report states that the results of the change will be used as a “guide for future service delivery recommendations” in District 3, which includes the downtown neighbourhoods east of Yonge Street. Officials with CUPE Local 416 have estimated that the privatization of garbage collection in District 4 could mean the loss of 200 to 250 unionized jobs. Those job losses would come after the elimination of 150 positions when garbage collection was first privatized in the west end in 2012.
City officials to report on privatizing trash collection east of Yonge
Source: Shawn Jeffords, Toronto Sun, November 21, 2016
The city is on track to contract out garbage collection east of Yonge St. Councillors on the public works committee voted 3-1 in favour of having city officials report early next year on a path to privatization. The committee made the move a day after Mayor John Tory told the Toronto Sun he will push to contract out garbage in the east end, arguing that it’ll save money. City council will have final say on the controversial issue at a later date. The mayor’s proposal was met with anger from the union that represents the city’s garbage collectors, insisting contracting out their work will not save taxpayers cash. Matt Figliano, of CUPE Local 416, said Tory doesn’t “have the facts.” He referred to a 2015 consultant’s report that said there was no cost savings to be had by contracting out. … The union accused Tory of attempting to fire 500 workers. If the city wants to find savings, it should eliminate managers, Figliano said. “For every four members that we have, we have one manager or supervisor that makes six figures. You’re attacking the hard-working men and women that make an average $50,000 a year. It’s a bloated bureaucracy, that’s what this is,” he said. Councillor Joe Mihevc said the city already has the right balance on trash collection that allows it to get the best cost, a mix of private and public collection. … Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong said he doubts the Ernst and Young report is correct given past experience with contracting out garbage collection in the west end. That saves the city $11.7 million a year. …
Garbage Privatization: Inside Toronto’s Two-Tier System
Source: Stefan Novakovic, Urban Toronto, November 18, 2016
Following the Ford administration’s privatization of residential garbage pick-up east of Yonge in 2011, the City of Toronto’s waste management has remained in a somewhat awkward state of semi-privatization. While residential trash west of Yonge is handled by private companies, the east end remains the purview of City service. However, with Mayor Tory now moving forward with a 2014 campaign pledge to outsource the City’s remaining garbage collection, the whole of Toronto could be moving towards private collection. But how does privatization work? And what are its impacts? In Toronto, the answers to these questions are at once relatively simple and profoundly complex. That’s because there are actually two types of privatization. While the City’s controversial outsourcing of pick-up and disposal follows a relatively straightforward process, a parallel form of privatized service follows different rules. … The privatization of service proposed by Mayor Tory follows a pair of earlier initiatives. A 1995 agreement saw pre-amalgamation Etobicoke privatize collection over two decades ago, while Rob Ford’s 2011 privatization of garbage service west of Yonge effectively bifurcated the city between public and private collection. In both instances—as in Tory’s current pitch—the outsourcing came about as a cost-saving measure. Following privatization, Etobicoke reported average annual savings of $1.8 million, while Ford’s initiative initially saw yearly costs reduced by $11.9 million. With support for Municipal service also hampered by two long and memorable garbage strikes in 2003 and 2009, the push for privatization was relatively well received in subsequent years. In particular, widespread displeasure with the 39-day garbage strike of 2009 eroded public backing for Toronto’s Civic Employees Union (CUPE). Nonetheless, some critics perceived privatized service as an inherent reduction in accountability in transparency, and as a symptom of unwillingness to adequately engage with the rights of unionized labour. …
Statement from CUPE 416 regarding city, Ernst and Young Reports regarding further contracting out of solid waste management
Source: Canadian Union of Public Employees, September 16, 2015
Earlier today, City of Toronto staff released their report on the benefits and drawbacks of contracting out solid waste management east of Yonge Street. This report was further supported by an independent analysis from accounting firm Ernst and Young. … While we strongly believe that public services like solid waste collection are best delivered directly by municipalities, the mixed model currently in effect in Toronto is an effective one which makes sense for residents.
City staff advise against contracting out east-end garbage
Source: Jennifer Pagliaro, Toronto Star, September 15, 2015
Mayor John Tory’s council allies are questioning the numbers used by city staff to recommend against contracting out garbage collection east of Yonge St. A report released Tuesday found it may actually cost more to privatize pickup in at least one east-end district despite what the city says was $11 million in annual savings from contracting out the same services in the west end. That creates a challenge for Tory, who during the mayoral election promised to privatize the remaining garbage pickup, citing cost savings — a long-held position by rivals Rob and Doug Ford. … taff tried to estimate what it might cost to contract out collection versus public service pickup over seven years, from 2017 to 2023. They compared the cost of contracted-out service in Etobicoke’s District 1 to in-house service in Scarborough’s District 4. They based the contract cost on the most recent garbage contract secured in 2014 for District 1. According to the city, those two suburban districts have comparable geography and building characteristics. Staff found the future cost reflected in present dollars of in-house service in District 4 — $96.8 million — is cheaper than assumed District 1 contracting-out costs at $116.8 million. …
Curbside Waste Collection Services Review: Comparison of Curbside Waste Collection Services East and West of Yonge Street
Source: General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, City of Toronto, Canada, September 9, 2015
The purpose of this report is to present the findings on the comparison of curbside collection districts in terms of costs, diversion rates, service levels and performance. It also provides an analysis of the financial and collection implications associated with the scenarios for contracting out collection services east of Yonge Street (Districts 3 and 4). A review of waste collection service delivery approaches in similar jurisdictions has also been undertaken. An independent financial analysis verification of the analysis was conducted by Ernst & Young LLP and is provided in Appendix C.
A year after the Decatur City Council chose not to outsource the city’s garbage service, privatization is no longer under consideration. The financials are better, city leaders are more content and sanitation employees whose jobs were threatened are happier and more relaxed. … Mayor Don Kyle, who has two weeks left in his term, said privatization is not an option anymore, especially considering the financial and service improvements. The department budget shows a $336,677 decrease in expenses from last year, down to $3.25 million for fiscal 2016 through Friday. Finance Supervisor Charlene Brueggeman said some expenses from September are still outstanding. The city budget shows expenses in the city garage, where because of aging vehicles most of the budget overruns occurred, were down $421,308 from last year to $252,815 for fiscal 2016 through Sept. 30, with some September expenses remaining through Friday. …
City-run garbage collection gets reprieve
Source: Bayne Hughes, Decatur Daily, September 17, 2015
… Kyle said some council members want him to give Sanitation Department workers a chance to improve service before they’re willing to consider the controversial move to privatization, which would mean layoffs of more than 30 employees. The city has five months remaining in which to award a contract on the four bids submitted Aug. 20 by private garbage companies. … The bids submitted by four companies Aug. 20 ranged from $12.52 a month per customer to $24.40 a month, with each adding annual increases as part of a three-year contract. The city’s 17,000 customers pay a monthly garbage rate of $16.50. However, Kyle estimates the city’s true costs for garbage service, which also include administrative costs and vehicle upkeep and purchases, are about $26 a month per customer. … Aging garbage and loader trucks and the cost of sending the trucks to private garages for repairs have been blamed for Sanitation’s major cost overruns. Through the end of August, Public Works had spent $295,336, easily surpassing its $160,000 budget, on sublet repairs. “If we had updated equipment, a majority of the additional costs wouldn’t have ever happened,” Woods said. “Our crew can be just as efficient, and we know the city.” …
Mayor says he will recommend privatizing garbage service
Source: Bayne Hughes, Decatur Daily, September 6, 2015
Mayor Don Kyle said he will recommend privatizing the city of Decatur’s garbage service, a controversial decision that’s been under consideration for at least a year. Kyle said he made the decision Wednesday after meeting with two garbage companies bidding to take over the financially struggling service. He plans to present the companies’ proposals to the City Council as soon as a work session can be scheduled. The mayor said the private companies are able to provide the same service more efficiently with fewer employees and new equipment. … A group of Sanitation Department employees who met with The Decatur Daily last week said they were disappointed to hear of the mayor’s plans, which could put at least 30 jobs at risk. …
Source: Dispatch Argus, October 18, 2016
After more than two years of talking trash, the city of East Moline and one of its public employee unions have reportedly inked a deal to privatize the city’s garbage service. On Monday,Mayor John Thodos told aldermen that the coming switch from city-provided service is the result of a pact reached with the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. AFSCME and some residents in the city had opposed the garbage plan since it was first suggested in 2014. … The change made sense then, city staff said, because contracting for garbage service would have allowed East Moline to get out of the garbage business without any layoffs. The staff report also said the move would save money through lower employee costs and allow the garbage department’s resources and money to be sold or shifted to other areas. It’s hard to keep a good idea down, however. Indeed, continued tough economic times and budget pressure ensured the idea would resurface. As a result, the city decided to go ahead with the private vendor in early March 2015. That was derailed, however, when AFSCME filed a complaint with the Illinois Labor Relations Board, sending the parties back to the bargaining table where the current deal apparently was ironed out. … We salute both sides for their commitment to doing what’s right for the residents of the city. Not only will taxpayers no longer be on the hook for repairing and replacing garbage trucks, which the mayor said cost about a quarter of a million dollars each — there will be long-term savings from eliminating four positions despite not laying off any workers. Republic Services, the only bidder for the job in March, won’t begin picking up garbage in East Moline until the first part of 2017, Mayor Thodos said. The company will work with residents to determine the size of garbage cans they prefer and will buy the city’s garbage trucks, he said. …
East Moline, AFSCME end trash talk, reach garbage agreement
Source: Leon Lagerstam, Dispatch Argus, October 17, 2016
City council members on Monday heard of an agreement recently reached with American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees to privatize garbage service. The city had planned to privatize the service in early March 2015, but AFSCME filed a complaint with the Illinois Labor Relations Board which required the idea to return to the bargaining table. Mayor John Thodos shared the news of the agreement during his “Report by the Mayor” part of Monday’s 20-minute city council meeting. He said he was glad a resolution was reached on the issue, calling it “good” for the city and union. No one loses their job, and the city projects it will save about $130,000 in revenue by letting Republic Services do garbage pickup, Mayor Thodos said. …
No private garbage service in East Moline
Source: Anthony Watt, Quad-Cities Online, June 27, 2015
A planned switch to private garbage service for residents won’t begin next week as planned because of an ongoing labor complaint. In March, the city council approved a contract with Republic Services to replace the current city-run garbage service to cover an $81,000 deficit in the general fund. The change was to include no layoffs — the city’s four garbage workers were to move to other city positions. The changeover is being contested by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which represents city employees….
EM [East Moline] moves closer to private garbage collection
Source: Anthony Watt, qconline.com, February 19, 2015
City officials may privatize East Moline’s garbage service to cover an expected general fund deficit. At Tuesday’s committee of the whole meeting, aldermen voted 4-3 to privatize the city’s garbage collection. …. A report provided to aldermen stated a seven-year private garbage contract with Republic Services would include about $141,000 in landfill host fees paid to the city. About $81,000 of that money could be used to cover the deficit, with the other $60,000 helping to control garbage service costs for residents. Still, the plan includes higher rates for East Moline’s 6,290 garbage service customers through the life of the contract. If host fees are used to offset costs, the monthly fee first will increase to $7.43 in 2016. By the final year, customers will pay $8.33 per month. …
EM [East Moline] to privative garbage service; fees to stay the same for 1st year
Source: Anthony Watt, qconline.com, September 15, 2014
The aldermen have tentatively approved a contract that will privatize city garbage service. The aldermen have been debating for weeks how to handle the service. The debate is based on the upcoming retirement of four public works employees, said city administrator Cole O’Donnell. The retirements would let East Moline’s four garbage department employees move to other positions as staff bid for the open public works spots. That would let the city close the garbage department without layoffs, a move Mr. O’Donnell said could mean long-term savings for East Moline through employee benefits. The city has been negotiating with Republic Services and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees simultaneously, and, during Monday night’s committee of the whole meeting, voted to go with the Republic offer. The vote was 4-1 with Ald. Ed DeJaynes, 4th Ward, voting against and Alds. Helen Heiland, 1st Ward; and Jeff Stulir, 3rd Ward, not present. The contract would be for seven years and the fees for residents would stay the same as they are now for the first year: $7.15 per month, according to a report provided to the aldermen. After that, the bill would increase, going to $7.43 per month in the second year, and rising to $8.33 per month by the final year of the contract. These rates would be based on the city making use of a fee paid to it by Republic, which owns the landfill, and also using some of the levy capacity from the former garbage fund, the report states. The rest of that capacity would go to the general fund. … b