Source: Joshua M. Wiener, SCAN Foundation, April 2009
As President Barack Obama and Congress debate health care reform, it is important that long-term care be included. While not central to providing basic health insurance to all Americans, long-term care should be part of efforts to improve health care for all Americans. Contrary to widespread belief that long-term care affects only a small minority of the population, 69 percent of people turning age 65 will need long-term care before they die and a third of the population will spend some time in a nursing home. In thinking about the place of long-term care in the health reform debate, four factors are important:
– First, with the aging of the population, the number of older people with disabilities is sure to grow
– Second, the federal and state governments spend substantial amounts of money on long-term care.
– Third, not only do older people and younger persons with disabilities use expensive long-term care services, they have high acute care expenses related to their underlying chronic diseases.
– Fourth, the current long-term care financing and delivery system is broken.
Source: Family Caregiver Alliance, April 2009
This database is here to bridge the research-to-practice gap and ensure that professionals working with families have access to meaningful and quality programs and services. It will assist researchers, program administrators, and practitioners identify successful and innovative programs, and also provide an understanding of what makes these programs successful. The aim of this repository is to:
*highlight fresh ideas from emerging practices
*promote adoption of practices informed by research
Family Caregiving: Emerging Practices & Tools for Professionals is the first step towards the creation of an Innovations Clearinghouse on Family Caregiving of cutting edge programs and policies in caregiving and aging. This online Clearinghouse will evolve to include evidence based practices, advocacy efforts and public policies that offer meaningful solutions, strengthen the caregiving voice and support families in their caregiving role. It will also provide dynamic educational opportunities and online communities of a national scope for professionals.
The information here is grouped into two categories:
1. Promising and Innovative Programs across the US
2. Practical Tools & Resources
Source: New York Health Policy Research Center, February 2009
This report provides a comparative analysis of New York State versus 18 selected states on various items related to long‐term care (LTC) such as state demographics for the elderly (defined as persons over age 65), poverty level, spending on long‐term care, long‐term care policies and services, and quality of nursing home care. The report is designed to demonstrate how New York State may differ from other states and inform hypotheses about why New York spends more Medicaid dollars on long‐term care delivery relative to most other states. The report was written for the New York State Department of Health, with funding support from the New York State Health Foundation.
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009
The Centers for Disease Control have unveiled a new website, which “provides all-hazards resources intended for individuals at healthcare facilities tasked with ensuring that their facility is as prepared as possible for an emergency. The healthcare facilities targeted by this page include hospitals, long-term acute and chronic care facilities, outpatient clinics and urgent care facilities, physicians’ offices, and pediatric offices and hospitals.”
Source: Lee Goldberg, National Academy of Social Insurance, Health and Income Security Brief No. 12, January 2009
From the summary:
The 2008 presidential election demonstrated a broad interest in health care reform focused on access to affordable quality care and cost containment for both public and private-sector payers. So far, the policy debate has centered on the delivery of acute care services, rather than long-term services and supports (LTSS). But there is a strong case that health care reform will not succeed unless LTSS are also addressed. This brief summarizes some views and history about policy opportunities for long term care that were voiced at a January 2008 roundtable and updates the possibilities to January 2009. Support for NASI’s distribution of the Brief comes from the SCAN Foundation.
Source: Center for Personal Assistance Services, 2009
PAS Workforce Library
Contains citations to resources related to each state. The library is provided and maintained by the National Clearinghouse on the Direct Care Workforce. Each citation contains an abstract and information about how to obtain the entire version.
* View the PAS Workforce library for any US State.
Number of Home and Personal Care Workers by State
The Center for PAS has tabulated, by state, estimates of the number of PAS workers and workers per persons with self-care difficulty.
* Read more and view the data for each US State.
Workforce Development Projects in Personal Assistance Services
More than 100 recently funded and currently funded research and demonstration projects to expand and improve the Personal Assistance Services workforce in the U.S.A. can be searched by state, category, and major federal, state, or foundation initiative. (updated 1/20/05)
* Search the Workforce Development Projects Database.
Source: Amy Hewitt, Sheryl Larson, Steve Edelstein, Dorie Seavey, Michael A. Hoge, John Morris, National Direct Service Workforce Resource Center, November 2008
From an abstract:
The Direct Service Worker Resource Center has released a white paper (pdf) that provides a first-ever overview of workforce challenges and practices across four critical service sectors:
intellectual and developmental disabilities
Usually, each of these sectors is studied and written about separately, reflecting a fragmentation that is deeply rooted in the separate funding, policy, service, and advocacy worlds of each of these sectors.
But this paper-written by a team of workforce experts (including PHI’s Steve Edelstein and Dorie Seavey) who span these service systems-takes a different approach. It sets out to investigate similarities and differences across the sectors in job titles and tasks, workforce demographics, supply and demand, job conditions and compensation, codes of ethical standards, training requirements, turnover, and career paths.
Source: Charlene Harrington, Terence Ng, Stephen H. Kaye, Robert Newcomer, Center for Personal Assistance Services, January 2009
Medicaid home and community based services (HCBS) have been the focus of widespread efforts by the federal and state government to expand access. The focus of this report is to examine issues of access, cost, and quality for Medicaid HCBS programs. The trends in state Medicaid HCBS programs, target groups, participants, and expenditures are summarized. The paper shows the progress in providing Medicaid HCBS but also identifies many current problems and policies. Inequities in access to services and limited funds result in unmet needs for HCBS. HCBS cost issues have been a primary focus of policy makers and quality problems are largely not addressed. Policy recommendations are made to improve access, costs and quality at the federal and state levels in the future.
Source: Center for Rural Health at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Health Workforce Information Center, February 2009
The Health Workforce Information Center (HWIC) provides free access to the most recent resources on the nation’s health workforce in one easy-to-use online location. Resources available through HWIC’s Web site will help health providers, educators, researchers and policymakers around the nation develop strategies to meet future workforce demands.
Through HWIC, you can stay up-to-date with the latest health workforce news and events, and connect with experts and organizations across the country.
HWIC offers the latest:
* Health workforce programs and funding sources
* Workforce data, research and policy
* Educational opportunities and models
* News and events
* Professionally-maintained and comprehensive online library
* E-mail news and updates
* Customized assistance from information specialists
Source: Karl Pillemer, Rhoda Meador, Charles Henderson, Jr., Julie Robison, Carol Hegeman, Edwin Graham, and Leslie Schultz, Gerontologist, Volume 48, Special Issue I , 2008
Employee retention programs for long-term care staff need to be cost-effective and evidence-based. A retention specialist (RS) situated in nursing homes is one strategy that could improve retention of certified nursing assistants (CNAs) in nursing homes.
The current article presented findings from a randomized, controlled evaluation of the Retention Specialist Program (RSP). RSP targeted systematic facility problems related to staff turnover. Data collection involved CNA interviews and measurement of turnover at 30 facilities at baseline, six months and 12 months. Facilities were randomly assigned to the treatment or control group. As part of the intervention, RSs received training on retention, provision of ongoing technical assistance, and leveraging community resources. Outcome variables were attitudes toward the facility and satisfaction and job stress.
* In treatment facilities, CNA turnover rates significantly decreased from baseline to 12-month assessment as compared to control facilities.
* CNA ratings of quality of care increased from baseline to six-month assessment. Similar change was seen in quality of staff education and facility trainings.
* No changes were observed in job satisfaction or stress.