Source: Benedict S. Jimenez, Journal of Public Admin. Research and Theory, First published online: April 1, 2013
From the abstract:
Advocates of citizen participation argue that a greater role for citizens in the budget process can help city governments undergoing fiscal retrenchment by improving budget choices and citizens’ willingness to pay, among others. A contrary view suggests that citizens are free riders who want lower taxes but oppose service cuts. How has citizen input influenced the choice of fiscal retrenchment strategies in municipal governments during the Great Recession? The analysis shows that when it comes to budget cutting, participatory cities have a higher probability of adopting highly contentious strategies, including eliminating services and laying off workers compared with nonparticipatory cities. For raising revenues, participatory cities avoid increasing property taxes. Citizens’ fiscal choices raise questions about the future of local autonomy and, ultimately, citizens’ ability to influence policymaking in the evolving intergovernmental system.